Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Hill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1982No. 81-131PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

The Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company brought a declaratory judgment action to determine whether certain sexual activities engaged in by its insured, James Hill, were covered under a homeowner’s policy which excludes “bodily injury or property damage which is either expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured.” The trial court found that Fireman’s Fund was obligated to defend James Hill in the civil action brought on behalf of the foster child and to pay all damages for which Hill might become liable. The insurance company appealed. We reverse.

James Hill and his wife…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Woida v. North Star Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Scott Rankin v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API