Legal Opinion

State v. Revelo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 26, 2001No. SC 16226PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

This appeal raises a question of first impression regarding the constitutional limits on judicial involvement in plea bargaining. The principal issue that we must decide is whether the due process rights of the defendant, Hector Revelo, were violated when the trial court: (1) offered to sentence the defendant to eight years imprisonment for the defendant’s plea of guilty of General Statutes § 21a-2781 in connection with the defendant’s sale of narcotics; (2) withdrew that offer upon learning that the defendant wished to exercise his right to a judicial determination of his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. D'AntonioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API