Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. City of Scottsdale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 28, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6300PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
In this appeal we consider the validity of the City of Scottsdale’s zoning ordinance establishing the Hillside District. In November, 1977 Scottsdale rezoned the area in and around the McDowell Mountains into the Hillside Conservation Area (Conservation Area) and the Hillside Development Area (Development Area). Essentially no new development was permitted on land falling within the Conservation Area. Joyce Corrigan, appellant (Corrigan), who owns land within the Hillside District, brought suit to declare the ordinance unconstitutional and prayed for monetary damages for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Third & Catalina Associates v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Corrigan v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Estate & Heirs of Sanchez v. County of BernalilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Jack v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.