Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Grezaffi
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 15, 2001No. 2 CA-CV 00-0172PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, J.
¶ 1 Appellant Molly Grezaffi, owner of a Tucson restaurant called Molly G’s, challenges the constitutionality of the City of Tucson’s restaurant smoking ordinance, Tucson Code § 11-19. We conclude that the ordinance is facially valid.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In October 1999, Grezaffi was cited on a civil infraction for having violated Code § 11-19(E)(2) which, inter alia, prohibits restaurant owners from allowing persons to smoke in restaurants except in a designated smoking area and from allowing smoke to diffuse or drift from a designated smoking area into a nonsmoking area. After…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Ex Parte Woodall, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Frat. Order of Eagles v. Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Foundation for Independent Living, Inc. v. Cabell-Huntington Board of HealthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.