Legal Opinion
Melvin v. Carl
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 11035PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the same was not taken within the time prescribed by law.
Judgment in the action was entered on July 23d, and notice of entry of judgment was served on July 27, 1928. Plaintiff served and filed her notice of intention to move for a new trial on August 1, 1928. The motion was noticed to be heard on September 26, 1928, and was called for hearing on that day. The motion was opposed on the grounds (1) that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was defective because it did not state whether the same would be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hughes v. AlsipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- O'Connell v. Main & Tenth Streets Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Hoover v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Cormond v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. IbosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Garcia v. LucidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Weinrich v. Sacramento Valley Sugar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930