Legal Opinion

Weinrich v. Sacramento Valley Sugar Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1930No. Docket Nos. 3850, 3851Published

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

These two cases were actions for damages for injuries inflicted upon respondent, Bernedette E. Weinrich, in case No. 3850, and for damages for the death of the mother of respondents Mercedes E. McLain and Bernedette E. Weinrich in case No. 3851, both caused by the alleged negligence of appellant A. M. Gelston in the operation of an automobile, "the said Gelston, at the time of said accident, being an employee of appellant Sacramento Valley Sugar Company and engaged in the performance of his duties as such employee. The two cases were consolidated and tried together. They…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Beckley v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Melvin v. CarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Taylor v. VolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Bellew v. BellewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API