Cormond v. United Railroads
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in' an action for damages for personal injuries.
On the 10th of December, 1913, at about the hour of 2 o’clock in the afternoon of that day, an east-bound Sutter Street car, operated by the defendant, collided with a wagon then being driven by plaintiff in a southerly direction across the intersection of Sutter and Franklin Streets in the city of San Francisco. As a result of the collision plaintiff was thrown from the wagon and injured. He thereupon instituted this suit for damages, claiming that (1) the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sprigg v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Christy v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Leonard v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Carver v. San Joaquin Cigar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Harrigan v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Secreto v. CarlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bauer v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Melvin v. CarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Morgan v. NeffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934