Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ibos

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1937No. Civ. 10440PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

The trial before the jury resulted in a judgment in favor of appellant and against respondent. Thereafter appellant notified respondent of the entry of judgment and respondent served and filed notice of his intention to move for a new trial. This notice designated the grounds of the future motion as (1) insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and that the verdict was against law and (2) error in law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the respondent, but failed to designate whether the motion would be made upon affidavits or the minutes of the court or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. La Manna v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Watkins v. NuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API