Truitner v. Knight
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts out of which the proceeding arises show that plaintiff, a minor of the age of twelve years, brought an action to recover damages against defendants for injuries suffered by her in an automobile accident.
The case came on regularly for trial before a jury. Plaintiff recovered a verdict in the sum of one thousand dollars. Thereafter defendant Truitner filed a certain notice in writing upon plaintiff which was expressly denominated in its heading as being “Notice of Intention to Move for New Trial.” The notice reads as follows: “You and each of you will please…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. Standard Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- O'Connell v. Main & Tenth Streets Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- Melvin v. CarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Truitner v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926