Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Lucido

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1961No. Civ. No. 19421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

Plaintiffs Delores and Placida Garcia brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant Antonio Lucido. Defendant Lucido answered, denying negligence on his part and alleging contributory negligence on the part of the driver Delores Garcia. After a trial by jury, verdict and judgment were for Placida Garcia against Lucido, and for Lucido against Delores Garcia. Plaintiff Delores Garcia then moved for and was granted a new trial on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict.

Lucido…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Reeves v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bernard v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Sitkei v. FrimelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Life v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Kisling v. OtaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Nichols v. HastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API