Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Young

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 24, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William Santiago appeals from a judgment of the county court denying without a hearing his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

In June, 2003, Santiago filed, in the Roxbury District Court (now the Roxbury Division of the Boston Municipal Court [Roxbury Division]), a motion seeking to vacate three G. L. c. 209A restraining orders that were issued between 1993 and 1995 for the protection of Paula Marie Young. In his G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition, Santiago alleged that despite his repeated requests, the lower court refused to act on his motion. He requested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rasten v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Sabree v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Harvey v. HarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Muldoon v. Superior Court Department of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Matthews v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar JunctionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  2. Stacy v. Superior Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API