Legal Opinion

Muldoon v. Superior Court Department of the Trial Court

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Emmett S. Muldoon appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying his petition for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. His petition sought an order compelling the Superior Court to act on a pending motion in his underlying civil action and to permit him to present oral argument concerning it.1 We affirm.

Based on the record before him, and settled law governing relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, Matthews v. D’Arcy, 425 Mass. 1021, 1022 (1997), we cannot say that the “single justice committed an error of law or abused his discretion in denying relief.” Devon Servs., Inc. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matthews v. D'ArcyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Russell v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. McElderry v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Martineau v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Devon Services, Inc. v. WellmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Awad v. Fisher CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Santiago v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Farahani v. Superior Court Department of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Muckle v. LamotheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API