Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Superior Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 17, 2018No. SJC 12577PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law.

Mark A. Stacy, pro se. Anna Lumelsky, Assistant Attorney General, for the Commonwealth. Stacy asserts that no such decision has been made. We have, however, been provided with a copy of the decision in question, and the Superior Court dockets plainly show that the motions have been denied. We express no view as to the merits of that decision. To the extent that Stacy is aggrieved by the denial of his motions, he has not shown that he lacks an adequate remedy in the ordinary appellate process.

Mark A. Stacy appeals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rasten v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Santiago v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edward Tyrone Jones v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API