Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar Junction

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 24, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners appeal from the denial of their petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. We affirm.

The petitioners sought an order compelling the Superior Court to resolve a pending motion for a preliminary injunction in an underlying declaratory judgment action. They claimed that, despite repeated requests, the court had failed to rule on the motion for over three years.3

The case was submitted on briefs. Lloyd Matthews, pro se. David J. Rentsch for the defendants.

As we have stated repeatedly, it is the petitioners’ obligation to “create a record — not merely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Rasten v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Matthews v. D'ArcyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Russell v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Lu v. Boston Division of the Housing Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santiago v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API