Legal Opinion

Rasten v. Northeastern University

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 12, 2000PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Anina Rasten appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying her petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

The relevant facts are as follows. On the day she was to appear in the Boston Municipal Court for a hearing on assessment of damages in a collection case then pending against her, Rasten appeared and requested a continuance. Her request was denied. Rasten immediately filed a petition in the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, seeking a continuance. The single justice denied the petition without a hearing.

The limited matter before us —…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Hines v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Hines v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Picciotto v. Superior Court Department of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Guardianship of NolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Lenardis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Sabree v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API