Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Harvey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 10, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner also sought an order from the single justice consolidating the divorce action and a tort action that the petitioner had commenced in the Superior Court for Essex County. That request was properly denied because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that there was no other avenue by which he could have sought consolidation. See Greco v. Plymouth Sav. Bank, 423 Mass. 1019, 1019 (1996) (“Relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is properly denied where there are adequate and effective routes other than c. 211, § 3, by which the petitioning party may seek relief’); Martineau v. Department of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greco v. Plymouth Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. McGuinness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Martineau v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clarke v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Kartell v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Pentlarge v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. Santiago v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Weaver v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API