Legal Opinion

Prock v. Bull Shoals Landing

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 2012No. CA 11-175PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUG MARTIN, Judge.

|T On November 1, 2007, in his employment for appellee Bull Shoals Landing, appellant Greg Prock was using an acetylene torch to cut the top off of a fifty-five-gallon barrel that had previously contained marine oil when the barrel exploded and caused a fire that seriously injured Prock and his co-worker, Matt Edmisten. Prock and Edmisten were taken to the hospital where they both tested positive for illegal drugs.1 Prock appeals the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s opinion finding that Prock failed to rebut the legal presumption that his accident and injury at work were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Texarkana School District v. ConnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Long v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Woodall v. Hunnicutt ConstructionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Weaver v. Whitaker Furniture Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prock v. Bull Shoals Boat LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Strother v. LaCroix OpticalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API