Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Edmisten v. Bull Shoals Landing

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 2012No. CA 11-313Published

1ConcurrenceJosephine Linker Hart, Judge

My reason for joining the majority in this case is set out in my concurring opinion in a companion case, Prock v. Bull Shoals Landing, 2012 Ark. App. 47, 390 S.W.3d 78, handed down this same day, January 11, 2012. I do note that the administrative law judge, whose opinion was adopted by the Commission, applied to this case the analysis I set out in my Prock concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prock v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012