Cedar Chemical Co. v. Knight
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.
This is an appeal from the March 14, 2006 decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) awarding benefits to appellee Jimmy T. Knight. The employer and insurance carrier appellants contend that no substantial evidence exists to support the Commission’s decision that appellee sustained a compensable injury. We affirm the Commission’s decision.
Facts
Knight is a fifty-five year old man who had been employed with appellant for about five years when he sustained his injury on July 1, 2001. Knight worked as a lead operator in Unit Six of the Cedar…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hou-Tex, Inc. v. Landmark Graphics, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Evans v. Bemis Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Hernandez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
- Owens Planting Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Prock v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.