Legal Opinion

Edmisten v. Bull Shoals Landing

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 2012No. CA 11-313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

| ¶ This workers’ compensation case is a companion case to Prock v. Bull Shoals Landing, 2012 Ark. App. 47, 390 S.W.3d 78, handed down this date. Appellant Matt Edmisten and Greg Proek were injured at work while Edmisten was holding the lid of a fifty-five-gallon drum as Proek opened the drum with a welding torch; the drum exploded, severely burning both Ed-misten and Proek. Drug tests showed the presence of marijuana metabolites in Ed-misten’s body.1

The ALJ made several findings: the provisions of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Act that provide for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Long v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Continental Express v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Nix v. Wilson World HotelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Prock v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API