Legal Opinion
Yonker v. City of San Gabriel
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 1937No. Civ. 5925PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff in this action had judgment against the defendants in the sum of $4,000 for damages alleged to have been caused to his property by reason of the negligent act of the defendants and also had judgment for an injunction as prayed for in the complaint. From this judgment and the decree granting an injunction the defendants appeal.
It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff during all the times mentioned in this action was the owner of a tract of land lying in the outskirts of the City of San Gabriel, county of Los Angeles, comprising about eight acres. In this land it appears…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bigelow v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cooper v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chesney v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Knight v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Veriddo v. RenaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Young v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.