Legal Opinion

Young v. County of Ventura

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1940No. Civ. 12552PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered when their real property was injured by flood water. A demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and the appeal is prosecuted from the judgment thereafter entered. In sustaining the demurrer the superior court based its ruling upon the failure of plaintiffs to file with the clerk of defendant county a verified claim in writing within 90 days after the storm which caused the damages. On this appeal plaintiffs argue that the ruling of the lower court results in a denial of their right to compensation for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Johnson v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Western Salt Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Sala v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Huffaker v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API