Legal Opinion

Veriddo v. Renaud

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1950No. Sac. 6098PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs seek damages because of a collision on November 8, 1945, between an automobile driven by plaintiff Veriddo and one operated by defendant. The accident assertedly was caused by defendant’s negligence. The complaint as amended alleges that at the time of the collision defendant was an employe of the State of California and that the automobile he was driving was owned by and being driven with the consent of the state, within the scope and course of defendant’s employment. Defendant demurred on the ground *264that the complaint, as amended, did not state a cause of action in that it failed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Payne v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bozaich v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Burgdorf v. FunderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Porter v. Bakersfield & Kern Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Chavez v. SpragueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API