Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Yant

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1965PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendants for loss of consortium, claiming this loss occurred as the result of an injury to her husband caused by defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile. A trial was had which resulted in a defendants’ verdict. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial. The court granted a new trial on the court’s own motion—not upon plaintiff’s motion. However, the order recited that the court had considered the affidavit of one of the jurors filed as a basis for plaintiff’s motion. Defendants appealed from the court’s order granting a new trial.

The affidavit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Coleman v. MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rogers v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Moore v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Blanton v. Union Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API