Legal Opinion

Blanton v. Union Pacific Railroad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1980No. A7606-08132, CA 11120, SC 26503PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*619PETERSON, J.

We granted review in this personal injury case to consider the scope of a trial judge’s discretion. The defendant railroad appealed from a verdict and a judgment for plaintiff, a brakeman, in an action for personal injuries under the Employers’ Liability Act, 45 USC § 51 (1976), and related statutes. The railroad admitted liability. On trial, the jury found for the plaintiff, and judgment was entered in his favor. Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in these respects, among others:

A. In failing to grant defendant’s motion for mistrial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. HaasOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API