Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Meyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1972PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

An action was brought by plaintiff, a lessor of real property, to recover for unpaid rents, taxes, insurance and maintenance allegedly owed by defendants, who were claimed to be the assignees of the original lessee. The defendants, mother and son, failed to answer or to appear otherwise, and an order of default and a judgment were entered against them. Shortly thereafter, an execution was issued on the bank accounts of the mother, and, approximately one month after the judgment was entered, defendants filed a motion pursuant to ORS 18.160 ① to set aside the default and the judgment on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Schmitz v. YantOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Snyder v. Consolidated Highway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rogue Valley Memorial Hospital v. Salem Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lowe v. Institutional Investors TrustOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Chopp v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API