Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1962PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crime of entering a motor vehicle with the intent to steal. The appeal is based upon the alleged error of the trial court in refusing to grant a new trial which was requested on the ground that the misconduct of a juror during the jury’s deliberation resulted in an unfair trial.

Zachary G-ilpin, the state’s principal witness, testified that he saw the defendant remove automobile tires from the back of a pick-up truck. He described in detail the circumstances under which the tires were stolen. This testimony was contradicted hy defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. ZlatovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Anton Vaughn Evalt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. West v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. AthornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API