State v. Gardner
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crime of entering a motor vehicle with the intent to steal. The appeal is based upon the alleged error of the trial court in refusing to grant a new trial which was requested on the ground that the misconduct of a juror during the jury’s deliberation resulted in an unfair trial.
Zachary G-ilpin, the state’s principal witness, testified that he saw the defendant remove automobile tires from the back of a pick-up truck. He described in detail the circumstances under which the tires were stolen. This testimony was contradicted hy defendant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ZlatovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Anton Vaughn Evalt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- West v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. AthornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.