S&R Associates, L.P. v. Shell Oil Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtQuillen, J.
This is the Court’s opinion on Defendant Shell Oil Company’s two Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 56. 1 For the reasons given herein, Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment on the claims of implied warranty of merchantability, implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, express warranty, civil conspiracy and deceptive trade practices are GRANTED. Motions for Summary Judgment as to the negligence claims, consumer fraud and the allocation of damages are DENIED.
I. FACTS
This action involves a dispute between the owner of residential housing units and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Nicolet, Inc. v. NuttSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Grand Ventures, Inc. v. WhaleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- The Joint Stock Society v. Udv North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Total Care Physicians, P.A. v. O'HaraSuperior Court of Delaware · 2001
- In re Warfarin Sodium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Pennsylvania Employee, Benefit Trust Fund v. Zeneca, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Lipson v. Anesthesia Services, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.