Legal Opinion
Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided September 18, 1973PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT BARCROFT’S COUNTERCLAIM: MOTION DENIED
QUILLEN, Chancellor: 1
In May of 1968, Barcroft Company (“Barcroft”) entered into an agreement with Dorr-Oliver Incorporated (“Dorr”), whereby Dorr was to design and construct a plant for the production of magnesium hydroxide paste on Barcroft’s site at Lewes, Delaware. Dorr subcontracted out a portion of this project (preparing and painting the interior linings of certain chemical process tanks) to Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. (“Cannon”), a paint contractor. Pursuant to a purchase…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Total Care Physicians, P.A. v. O'HaraSuperior Court of Delaware · 2001
- Guardian Construction Co. v. Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1990
- Danforth v. Acorn Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- J.L. v. BarnesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2011
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.