Legal Opinion
Laremont-Lopez v. Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Center
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 3, 1997No. Civil Action 2:96cv1202, 2:96cv1213, 4:97cv7, 2:97cv203PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MORGAN, District Judge.
Between December 1996 and February 1997, complaints signed by the plaintiffs, ostensibly proceeding pro se, were filed in the above-styled cases. Based upon representations made to the Clerk’s office and the content of certain documents, it appeared that the complaints were in fact drafted by the attorneys of a local law firm (the “Attorneys”). 1 Concerned that this practice was inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which incorporate the diseiplin ary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Judson Warren White v. C.M. White, Warden A v. Dodrill, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Duran v. CarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Ricotta v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
- In Re MungoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
- In Re Fengling LiuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.