Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 10, 2015No. Civ. A. H-13-2464PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for a racially discriminatory termination of employment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § Í981, are Defendant Federal Express Corporation’s (“FedEx’s”) motion for summary judgment (instrument #22) and Plaintiff Roddie Morgan’s (“Morgan’s”) opposed motion for leave to file a -late response to FedEx’s motion for summary judgment (# 28).

After a careful review of the record and the applicable law, for the reasons indicated below the Court finds Morgan’s…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Fayak v. Univ. Hosps.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Barfield v. Fed. Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
  3. Anita Robertson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
  4. Babineaux v. United National Insurance CoDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Barrientos v. Mikatsuki International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API