Legal Opinion
Ricotta v. State of California
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 15, 1998No. 97CV1667-J (CGA)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
On November 5, 1997, Thomas Rieotta (“Plaintiff’) filed an Amended Complaint (“Am.Compl.”) alleging the following four causes of action: 1) violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 2) violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, (“RICO”) 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), 3) conspiracy to interfere with his civil rights pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986, and 4) a cause of action for equitable, injunctive, declaratory relief and restitution. In his Amended Complaint Plaintiff names eighteen Defendants who allegedly harmed him during…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Smallwood v. NCsoft Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Long v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Ramos v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- In Re MerriamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.