Legal Opinion
Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 20, 1924No. 246 and 232PublishedCited by 304 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
These cases were argued together and will be disposed of in one opinion. The principal question presented in the Michaelson case, and the sole question in the Sandefur case, is whether the provision of the Clayton Act of October 15, 1914, c. 323, 38 Stat. 738, 739, §§ 21, 22, requiring a jury trial in certain specified kinds of contempt is constitutional. Subordinate questions presented in the Michaelson case axe: (a) Whether petitioners were, or whether it is necessary that they should be, “ employees ” within the meaning of the act, § 20; (b) whether the acts alleged to constitute the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Gompers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by304 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.