Legal Opinion

In Re Mungo

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 17, 2003No. 19-00488PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the Court’s Rule to Show Cause and Order to Appear (the “Rule”) entered on September 23, 2003. The Rule required Richardo J. Mungo (“Debtor”) and his counsel, Francis S. Santore, Jr., (“San-tore”) and George Hunter McMaster (“McMaster”), to appear and show cause why Debtor’s pleading filed pro se should not be stricken, why pro hac vice admission should not be revoked, and why sanctions should not be ordered. Debtor and his counsel appeared and were heard at a hearing on September 23, 2003.

FINDINGS OF FACT 1

1.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duran v. CarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Lloyd G. Ellis v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  3. Laremont-Lopez v. Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. Johnson v. Bd. of County Com'rs County of FremontDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  5. Clarke v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Mitchell v. Anderson (In re Mitchell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  4. In re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
  5. In Re BabiesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API