Legal Opinion

State Housing Council v. City of Lake Oswego

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1980No. 78-030, CA 15395PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The issue is the jurisdiction of the Land Conservation and Development Commission to review local government taxation and budget ordinances for compliance with the statewide planning goals. We hold that LCDC does not have such jurisdiction.

The State Housing Council initiated this proceeding before LCDC, contending that the City of Lake Oswego did not consider or comply with the statewide planning goals in adopting Ordinance No. 1706. That ordinance imposes a "system development charge” on all new construction in Lake Oswego. The Housing Council contended generally that Lake Oswego had failed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. KahrigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Sonzinsky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Pendleton v. KernsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Pendleton v. KernsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Scappoose Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API