Legal Opinion

Scappoose Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Columbia County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. 922141; CA A99356PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

In October 1992, plaintiff brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against defendant Columbia County challenging the validity of Ordinance 92-8, which the county enacted in September 1992 to amend the fee provisions of its Surface Mining Ordinance. Plaintiff contends that the two-cent per ton “regulatory fee” that the 1992 ordinance imposes on plaintiff and others engaged in surface mining is a “tax” and that, therefore, the county was required to, but did not, submit it to the voters pursuant to ORS 203.055. Plaintiff also maintains that the ordinance is invalid because the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Haugen v. GLEASONOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. People v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API