Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority v. City of Medford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 7, 1994No. LUBA 92-172; LUBA 92-192; CA A84711PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

Petitioner Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (petitioner) is a district established under ORS chapter 450, which provides sewer services to property located in urbanizahle, unincorporated areas that are inside the city of Med-ford’s urban growth boundary. In 1992, the city and Jackson County adopted identical urbanization policies as part of their acknowledged comprehensive plans. The policies provide, as relevant:

“Within the unincorporated urbanizable area, execution and recording of an irrevocable consent to annexation to the City, pursuant to ORS 222.173, shall be required for:
“B)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Heritage Enterprises v. City of CorvallisOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Heritage Enterprises v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cape v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Johnson v. City of La GrandeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Jones v. City of McMinnvilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API