Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLS
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
This is a petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals (27 Or App 225, 555 P2d 801 (1976)), which held that ORS 197.175(1) did not apply to city annexations and, therefore, that the City of Klamath Falls was not required to consider the statewide land use planning goals of ORS 215.515 and was not required to comply with the procedural requirements of Fasano v. Washington County Comm., 264 Or 574, 507 P2d 23 (1973), when enacting this relatively small tract annexation ordinance. Petitioner Petersen filed a writ of review in circuit court to challenge the ordinance in question in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Green v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Tierney v. DurisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- SCHMIDT v. City of CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.