City of Pendleton v. Kerns
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The issue presented is whether the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) has jurisdiction to review a city ordinance that authorizes the improvement of an already dedicated street and sets up a local improvement district (LID) to finance the construction.
North Main Street in the City of Pendleton was first dedicated as a city street in 1915. The portion of the street at issue here, however, has never been improved. In 1958, the city rejected a request to vacate the unimproved segment, but it did permit property owners in the area to barricade the end of the improved street and use the remainder as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Watzig v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- City of Pendleton v. KernsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Billington v. Polk CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Scappoose Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Cape v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.