Legal Opinion

Jarvill v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1980No. CA 8516, SC 26299PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*159HOWELL, J.

These three cases, consolidated for trial and appeal, involve a comprehensive challenge to the validity of a charter amendment and various ordinances enacted by the City of Eugene ("City”) to revitalize its downtown core area. Eugene, like many other cities, became concerned that its downtown business area was not economically competitive with outlying shopping areas for various reasons, including the lack of adequate parking facilities.

In July, 1973, the voters approved an amendment to the charter conferring on the city council the power

"To establish, and from time to time to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Cook v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gilman v. City of SheboyganSupreme Court of the United States · 1863

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API