Fink v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
This original proceeding seeks to prohibit the respondent court from entertaining or passing upon a motion for a new trial in the case of Benjamin Fink, Plaintiff, v. William Weisman et al., Defendants. The circumstances giving rise to this petition are as follows: The case mentioned was tried by the respondent court with a jury. The jury returned its verdict in favor of plaintiff on March 18, 1930, and immediately the defendants orally made motions for a judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict of the jury. The court continued the hearing until the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Sallden v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Bragg v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Daily v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Nelson v. GrondahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Insurance Industry Initiative Campaign Committee v. EuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.