Legal Opinion
State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1942No. S. F. 16678PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioners seek to have annulled a judgment of contempt rendered for an alleged violation of a writ of mandate issued upon a judgment in a mandamus proceeding. Petitioners are the State Board of Equalization and the State Personnel Board, and the members of those boards, and the executive officer of the latter board, and the State Controller.
On March 29, 1940, respondent Superior Court of Los Angeles County rendered a judgment in a mandamus proceeding commanding petitioners to reinstate Robert A. Brown, Lewis Torrance, George McNamara, John T. Brady, Daniel H. Hudelson, William…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wiles v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Kelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.