Legal Opinion

Hill v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 14, 2003No. 02-3220PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

349 F.3d 1068

Brian Arthur HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Patrick SCOTT; Catherine Pavlak; Mark Pierce, all individually and in their professional capacities as St. Paul police officers; Defendants-Appellees,

Michael Rasmussen; Jerome Steffen; Defendants,

City of St. Paul, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-3220.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 14, 2003.

Filed: November 14, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Wayne J. Rice of Minneapolis, MN.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was James F.X. Jerskey,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hill v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Karla Kaye Kuehl v. Stephen P. Burtis Terry Satterlee Other John Doe City of Sioux Falls Ezekial James McBethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Alexander Patton v. Raymond PrzybylskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stuart Wright v. Sean FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Tyslen BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Starrett v. City of LanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. William Rogers v. Jason AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. Hayes v. Kern CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API