Legal Opinion

Cemer v. Huskoma Corp.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1985No. 85-216PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

Huskoma Corporation and Argonaut Insurance Company (jointly referred to as Huskoma) appeal from an order entered by a three-judge panel of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court, finding that the appellee, Curtis W. Cerner, had suffered a “latent and progressive injury that was not diagnosed until September, 1983.” The three-judge panel reversed the order entered following a hearing before a single judge of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court, who had found that Cemer’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the decision of the three-judge panel.

On July 1, 1981,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borowski v. Armco Steel CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ohnmacht v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Maxey v. Fremont Department of UtilitiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. O'Connor v. Anderson Brothers Plumbing & HeatingNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Thomas v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Bernhardt v. County of Scotts BluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Oham v. Aaron Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Garnsey v. Concrete Inc. of HobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API