Legal Opinion

Maxey v. Fremont Department of Utilities

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1985No. 84-606PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff has appealed from an order of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court on rehearing which dismissed his claim for benefits allegedly arising out of an accident on May 15, 1980, because of the running of the 2-year statute of limitations.

Plaintiff assigns as errors: (1) The holding that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations; (2) The failure to hold that payment of medical expenses by the defendant-employer’s health insurance carrier did not constitute payment of workmen’s compensation benefits; (3) The holding that plaintiff’s injury was not latent and progressive; and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fremont Contract Carriers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Elsas v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Baade v. Omaha Flour Mills Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ashton v. Blue River Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Borowski v. Armco Steel CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Snipes v. VickersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  4. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cemer v. Huskoma Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API