Legal Opinion

Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris Division

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1989No. 66428PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

The petitioner is a retired employee of respondent, Dover Corporation. Respondent corporation employed the petitioner for approximately fourteen and one-half years as a steelworker. The petitioner’s job was to operate machinery used in forging sucker rods used in the oil and gas industry.

At least as early as 1975, the petitioner began experiencing hearing loss and was fitted with a hearing aid. At about the same time, the respondent began sponsoring hearing examinations at their place of business and conducting hearing safety seminars. Because the machinery used in its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Peoria County Belwood Nursing Home v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Banks v. St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Sneed v. McDonnell DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Nielsen v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API