O'Connor v. Anderson Brothers Plumbing & Heating
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stuart, District Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The only issue presented is whether the action was barred by the 2-year statute of limitations, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-137 (Reissue 1978).
The one-judge compensation court entered an order of dismissal, holding that the plaintiff’s claim was barred. On rehearing, the three-judge panel of the Workmen’s Compensation Court reversed, and found that plaintiffs condition was latent and progressive and his claim was, therefore, not barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company appeals. We affirm.
O…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Welke v. City of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Astuto v. V. Ray Gould Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Williams v. DobbersteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Borowski v. Armco Steel CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Peek v. Ayers Auto SupplyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Foote v. O'Neill PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Maxey v. Fremont Department of UtilitiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Gloria v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Wilson Concrete Co. v. RorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Cemer v. Huskoma Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.