Legal Opinion
Oham v. Aaron Corp.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1986No. 85-235PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.
The defendant-appellant, Aaron Corporation, appeals from an order of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court finding that the plaintiff remained temporarily totally disabled. We affirm.
In 1977 Percy L. Oham was employed as a laborer by the Aaron Corporation, where he placed meat in cookers to render off the grease. During the period of his employment, he contracted acute brucellosis, a bacterial disease common to certain animals.
In December of 1977 Oham filed a claim for benefits with the compensation court and, after hearing, was awarded temporary total disability benefits in the amount of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pavel v. Hughes Brothers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Runyan v. Lockwood Graders, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Wilson v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Cemer v. Huskoma Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Thompson v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Professional Firefighters of Omaha, Local 385 v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- McGee v. Panhandle Technical Systems, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Kopp v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. DeyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.