Legal Opinion

Ohnmacht v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1965No. 35962PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. One judge of the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court and later that court sitting en banc dismissed the petition. On appeal to the district court, the dismissal was affirmed. The plaintiff has appealed.

The basic issue is whether or not the plaintiff’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations.

The plaintiff, while employed by the defendant as a carpenter in Omaha, Nebraska, tripped and sprained his ankle on July 15, 1960. He continued to work the rest of the day. He thereafter reported to Dr. Leahy, a physician employed by the defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rahfeldt v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Seymour v. Journal-Star Printing CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bame v. Lipsett, IncorporatedNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Letteau v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Webb v. CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williams v. DobbersteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Borowski v. Armco Steel CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Maxey v. Fremont Department of UtilitiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cemer v. Huskoma Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API