Legal Opinion

White v. Logan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1954No. 310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

It is well settled that tbe plea of payment is an affirmative one, and tbe general rule is that tbe burden of showing payment must be assumed by tbe party interposing it. Davis v. Dockery, 209 N.C. 272, 183 S.E. 396; Furst v. Taylor, 204 N.C. 603, 169 S.E. 185; Collins v. Vandiford, 196 N.C. 237, 145 S.E. 235; Swan v. Carawan, 168 N.C. 472, 84 S.E. 699. See also Joyce v. Sell, 233 N.C. 585, 64 S.E. 2d 837; 8 Am. Jur., Bills and Notes, Sec. 1035; 40 Am. Jur., Payment, Sec. 278. The burden of proof is a substantial right. Davis v. Dockery, supra; Collins v. Vandiford, supra.

Here tbe defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Furst v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Joyce v. SellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Swan v. . CarawanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Collins v. . VandifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Davis v. . DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Thompson v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. AUTO FINANCE COMPANY OF NC v. McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Smith Builders Supply, Inc. v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Mills International, Inc. v. Holmes (In re Mills International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API